untitled

There are only four of ’em, but They’re Important



Jeff Chatlos interrogates himself on the subject of aesthetics:

Q1: Is all material in any given art form equal? [note that I’m using “art form” in it’s broadest sense.]

Q2: Is it fair to compare material within an art form? Can material in one form be reasonably compared with material in another art form?

Q3: Is a “canon” or “hierarchy” valid (or even necessary) when talking about art? If so, how is it created and what is it’s use?

Q4: If I don’t find something interesting or even entertaining, is it still valid, and can I assign it to similar works in a hierarchy? [I may need to redefine this question later]

His answer–to each of them–a qualified “yes”… What follows (in the body of the post, and in comments by the likes of Alan David Doane) is an earnest attempt to defend (what I consider) the indefensible–an objective aesthetic hierarchy.



And yeah, of course, I chimed in with a typo-ridden blast of my own!

Good Afternoon Friends!
Dave

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s